Architect salaries in 2013 increase from 2011

{"version":"0.3.0","atoms":[],"cards":[["images-card",{"images":[{"url":"http:\/\/res.cloudinary.com\/dpcbzfiye\/image\/upload\/v1458754346\/oiecwzrmqs0zyvgqq0zj.jpg","id":"1911"}]}],["images-card",{"images":[{"url":"http:\/\/res.cloudinary.com\/dpcbzfiye\/image\/upload\/v1458754434\/xw7of9h2d16pwayfwsyc.jpg","id":"1916"}]}],["images-card",{"images":[{"url":"http:\/\/res.cloudinary.com\/dpcbzfiye\/image\/upload\/v1458754684\/rtla6t9cczt790stdkrd.jpg","id":"1921"}]}]],"markups":[],"sections":[[1,"h2",[[0,[],0,"Average\ntotal compensation for architecture positions rose slightly"]]],[1,"p",[[0,[],0,"Over\nthe last several years, most architecture firms have benefited from a general\nimprovement in the economy as well as in the construction sector. Revenue at\narchitecture firms increased almost 11 percent in 2012 from 2011 levels, according\nto U.S. Census Bureau figures, and firm payrolls have followed suit. But this\nmodest improvement in business conditions has done little to lift compensation\nlevels at firms. Between 2011 and 2013, average total compensation for\narchitecture positions\u2014including base salary, overtime, bonuses, and incentive\ncompensation\u2014increased only slightly over 1 percent per year, barely more than\nthe average increase in compensation between 2008 and 2011, when the\nconstruction sector was still in steep decline.\n\n\n\n"]]],[1,"p",[[0,[],0,"Even this modest 1 percent increase in average architect\ncompensation may overstate the experience of the typical architect during this\nperiod. Average compensation depends on the mix, by experience levels, of\npositions reporting. Since many less experienced architecture positions were\neliminated during the downturn, current average compensation may reflect a\nhigher share of more experienced (and more highly compensated) positions.\nRegardless, while average compensation for architecture positions increased a\nmere 0.7 percent per year compounded between 2008 and 2011, growth increased to\nonly 1.1 percent per year between 2011 and 2013."]]],[1,"p",[[0,[],0,"\n\n\n\n"]]],[10,0],[1,"p",[[0,[],0,"Architecture staff compensation tends to be more volatile\nover the business cycle than compensation for most other occupations. Over the\npast decade, compensation gains for architecture positions have more than kept\npace with compensation across the entire economy. Architecture compensation\nincreased 35 percent between early 2002 and early 2013, compared to just under\n32 percent for all professional and related staff (typically defined as\nwhite-collar workers such as lawyers, accountants, etc.), and just over 29\npercent for all private-sector workers."]]],[1,"p",[[0,[],0,"\n\n\n\n"]]],[10,1],[1,"h3",[[0,[],0,"Compensation\nlevels vary by firm size"]]],[1,"p",[[0,[],0,"Historically, large architecture firms have offered higher\nlevels of compensation. These comparisons are more difficult for more senior\npositions because job responsibilities are difficult to compare across firms of\ndifferent sizes. However, this disparity exists even for positions with\nrelatively standard job descriptions such as Intern 1 or Architect 1."]]],[1,"p",[[0,[],0,"At firms with fewer than 10 employees, Intern 1 compensation\naveraged 10 to 15 percent below national averages. At firms with more than 250\nemployees, Intern 1 compensation averaged more than 10 percent above the\nnational average. A similar pattern held for Architect 1 positions: about 10\npercent below the national average at firms with fewer than 10 employees, and\nalmost 10 percent above the national average at firms with 250 or more\nemployees."]]],[1,"p",[[0,[],0,"\n\n\n\n"]]],[1,"h3",[[0,[],0,"Staff\nturnover and fringe benefits reflect improvement\n\n\n\n"]]],[1,"p",[[0,[],0,"Another sign that business conditions have stabilized across\nthe profession is that benefits offered to employees have begun to modestly\nimprove at many firms. While declining between 2008 and 2011 as firm revenues\neroded, they rebounded modestly by 2013, with benefits packages averaging 18\npercent of base salaries for professional staff. Benefits have bounced back\nfaster at larger firms and remain significantly higher than those offered by\nsmaller firms."]]],[1,"p",[[0,[],0,"\n\n\n\n"]]],[10,2]]}